After reading this post over at Nanette's Underachieving Mommy, I am inspired to write about my pregnancy.
(Many of you know the story, so feel free to skip this retelling. I'll see you back here next time, when we'll discuss my incredulity at the fact that Rachel Ray is America's second-most-trusted celebrity.)
Getting pregnant was the easy part. It took only five months of trying, and that last month we weren't really trying very hard. It was December, we were stressed out and busy with holiday parties, gigs, trying to get our annual holiday CD out the door (someday, friends, we'll start that tradition back up again, but I don't think this is the year).
So we were kind of taking the month off from trying to get pregnant, which is apparently what it took to get the job done. The timing was nice -- we found out a few days before Christmas, so on Christmas Day we shared the news with our parents and brothers -- and swore them to secrecy. Not another soul was to know until we were out of the first trimester and in the (mythical) pregnancy safe zone.
Two weeks later, spotting and cramping sent me to the OB in a panic. It was a week before my first scheduled visit, but I was convinced a miscarriage was underway. Poor Airan was on a train from downtown, desperately trying to get to the hospital in time to be there for the ultrasound, but he didn't even come close. So I was all alone with the ultrasound tech when I got the big news -- two heartbeats, two little sacs, two babies.
(Ironic, because I'd just spent a few months teasing my pregnant friend Mary Beth about how she was eating for three, right up until her 20-week ultrasound, when she found out she was having twins. It was my karmic backlash -- I wished twins on MB, and I got them myself in return.)
So another round of phone calls to the parents and brothers with even more big news. Much rejoicing! And a little bit of fear -- because of my osteogenesis imperfecta and thus my low muscle tone, I was scared that my body wouldn't be able to keep it together through a twins pregnancy. My OB was optimistic, but I had doubts.
And just a few years earlier, my cousin Jim and his wife had premature twin boys who stayed in a NICU for six weeks after their birth -- I remember being terrified by pictures of those tiny little preemies, thinking they looked so tired, so world-weary, so fragile. How can such tiny babies survive in the world? But they did survive and thrive, and so I tried not to be too afraid.
At this point, it wasn't even crossing my mind that the twins might have inherited OI from me. I knew it was a possibility, but I wasn't worried. My OI wasn't diagnosed until I was seven, so I assumed that, if the twins did have OI, we wouldn't know or have to deal with it for years.
And so the first trimester went happily along, with lots of morning sickness, a queasy but otherwise fun trip to Paris, the barest beginnings of sort of starting to get ready for twins. We had OB visits every other week, with ultrasound heartbeat checks every time, so we were amassing quite a collection of in utero baby pictures.
At week 17, we got the ultrasound tech to place her bets on the babies' genders. She wouldn't give us 100% certainty, but she was 90-95% sure we had a couple of girls in there. Much rejoicing! Half the family confessed to secretly hoping for girls. (Honestly, I'd been sort of hoping for boys because I remember what a horrible bitch I was as a 13-year-old, but as soon as I got the girls verdict, I was converted. Girls rule!)
A few more weeks of happiness/nausea, and then the 20-week level II ultrasound. We should have been suspicious when the ultrasound tech, after chatting away through her evaluation of baby A (Evelyn), suddenly clammed up and was silent as she took measurements of baby B (Sophia). But we didn't notice. And when the doctor came in, all serious, asking me questions about my OI, still it didn't occur to us that anything was amiss. And then she showed us Sophia's femur, her thigh bone, and pointed out the fact that it appeared to be broken. And bowed. And not quite as long as it should be. And that was our evidence, years before I expected it, that at least one of the twins had OI.
It seems, as I write this, like this discovery shouldn't have been that big a deal. So what if Sophie has OI? I've lived my life with this disease. Yeah, it's really sucked at times, but it's never been life threatening, and it's never prevented me from doing anything I really wanted to do. (I never wanted to go skiing anyway. Roller skating, however...) And being an adorable seven-year-old trapped in the hospital for weeks on end has its advantages -- never in my life have I had such good luck getting people to bring me stuffed animals and root beer floats and anything else my heart desires.
Here's why I was so upset to learn about Sophie's (and, in a few more ultrasounds, Evie's) OI:
1) I know what it's like. I know having OI sucks. And I think, when I was growing up, it must have been much harder for my parents than it was for me. So I was scared for them and scared for us.
2) I did this to them. I knew full well that any child I have has a 50% chance of inheriting OI from me. I casually chose to believe that I wouldn't pass it on, that everything would be just fine, that we'd beat the odds. I am to blame for this, and had I not been so blase, so careless, I could have prevented this. (Here's where I choose not to think about the fact that, had we actually used genetic testing and in-vitro fertilization to avoid passing on OI, the egg(s) that became Sophie and Evie would have been discarded, and those precious girls would never have existed.)
We had only a few more weeks to deal with this knowledge before the next blow came. At my 25-week routine appointment, they couldn't get a good look at my cervix on the ultrasound. The OB did an internal exam and found that my cervix was completely effaced and I was starting to dilate. With 15 weeks to go.
Bed rest. They let me spend the first few days at home, but then (skip ahead, o ye of weak stomach) I lost my mucus plug. Airan rushed me to the hospital, where they discovered that I was having contractions. They drugged me and kept me in the hospital, dangling the promise that maybe in a few more days they'd let me go home to finish out my bed rest. Cue the amniotic fluid leak. Not a gushing flow, just a slow, steady leak. (I now understand why water torture is so effective -- especially if it were to involve your girl parts.)
No hope of going back home now. A fluid leak meant a risk of infection, so they had to monitor me and the babies several times a day to make sure we were all still healthy. At this point, the best they were hoping for was to get me to 34 weeks -- and from 26 weeks, that seems like a very, very long time to be stuck in the hospital on bed rest. Alas, I didn't get to find out just how awful that would be.
At 28 weeks, my water broke for real. Hard labor hit, and I spent the night writhing and moaning in a delivery room, hoping they could get the labor to stop, knowing we were looking at an emergency C-section first thing in the morning.
How can it be that the most terrifying day of your life is also the best? My tiny, tiny babies came into the world 12 weeks before they should have. They couldn't breathe without help, they couldn't eat, they had to be kept in incubators to maintain their body heat. That instinct that kicks in when you have a baby, the overwhelming need to protect and care for and provide -- useless. There wasn't anything I could do for them. But that's the day I got to meet them, finally got to see those little people who had been screwing up my life for the past six months (and who will continue to do so for the next 18 years), and welcoming them into the world was the best thing that's ever happened to me.
The girls stayed in the NICU for 10 weeks. The 10 longest, hardest weeks ever. In the beginning, while it wasn't exactly easy to leave them there, we knew and accepted that it was necessary. They couldn't breathe, they couldn't eat. They couldn't come home. But as they got bigger and stronger, as they were weaned off the breathing apparatus, as they learned to drink from a bottle, as they were moved from their little heater isolettes to open-air cribs, it got harder and harder to leave them there every night, to go home without them to an empty condo, a deserted nursery with two gaping cribs.
I started to lose it. Once-respected doctors became quacks, crackpots. Who let these idiots out of medical school? They didn't know how to care for my children. Nurses who had been friends and confidants became The Enemy. They didn't know how to care for my babies. I needed to get those girls home, where I could make sure they were getting the care they needed. I could feed them and change them and handle them carefully -- I didn't want those ham-handed nurses laying a finger on the girls.
Discharge came not a day too soon.
And, truly, happily, ever since those girls came home, life has been grand. Sure, we've had many sleepless nights. We have the occasional scare. Two babies/toddlers are a handful, that's for sure, and when you throw in a few special needs, things are even more complicated. But I wouldn't change a thing. The rocky path we took got us exactly where I want to be. Y'all know I'm not religious, so I won't say there was some sort of plan or destiny or any such nonsense. But we make the best of what life hands us, and I love my lot in life.
So that's the story. Still with me? Don't worry, I won't blame you if you skipped a paragraph or two. It's a long saga, and we all have our stories of hardship. I don't think mine is especially outstanding or unusual. It's just a big part of what got me where I am today, so it is (understandably) interesting to me. I hope you're not too bored, and I promise to move on to lighter topics next time.
(Update: See this post for more uninformed exposition about twins.)
1) Are they twins? I concede that you might not know for sure with fraternal twins who are very dissimilar, especially boy/girl twins. But, seriously, you're looking at my girls who are practically mirror images of each other, and you're asking me whether they're twins? Do you need to have your vision checked?
2) Are they identical or fraternal? We don't know.3) What do you mean, you don't know? How can you not know? There's a gray area, people. And we're not willing to draw blood from them just to find out whether they're identical or not. We don't really care that much. (But we think they're identical.)
4) Do twins run in your family? No. Not that it matters, especially if the girls are identical. Identical twins aren't hereditary. And all the fraternal twins I know were born to moms who don't have twins in the family, so I guess it doesn't matter for them, either.
A twist on that question: "Are twins on your side or your husband's side?" Well, neither, but if they were on his side, it would have no bearing whatsoever on whether I'd have twins. For twins to be "in your family," so to speak, you have to be a woman with a blood relation to a woman who has given birth to fraternal twins. Men have nothing to do with it. (Sorry, guys.)
[Full disclosure: Okay, so my great-grandmother had twins who died shortly after birth. We don't know whether they were fraternal or not, but I guess that could mean that maybe I do have twins in my family. I always forget about that. And, yes, my cousin and his wife have adorable twin boys. That doesn't count, because I'm not related to my cousin's wife, and their boys are almost certainly identical, like my girls.]
5) Did you use fertility treatments? [Usually this is more of an assumption than a question: Look at that, another set of fertility-treatment twins.] Not that it's any of your business, but no. I think people assumed that, since we'd been married for seven years before we got pregnant, surely there must have been fertility issues. Nope. We just weren't ready for kids those first seven years. When we finally did decide to get pregnant, we made up for lost time with our two-for-one deal.6) [And I'm not kidding here -- you'd be shocked by how many people ask this.] Which one is the bad one? Ask me when they're 13, and I'm sure I'll say they both are.
(All you twin moms, feel free to chime in with the obnoxious questions people ask you over and over and over again.)
I'm beginning to suspect a conspiracy.We vacuumed the living room floor again this morning for the third day in a row (as part of the infestation-eradication plan, not because I'm obsessed with the Animal -- which isn't to say I'm not obsessed with the Animal). And yet again, that dust cup was disgustingly full of dust and dirt and debris. Really? Still? After three days, the carpet is still that gross? It's time to take apart that vacuum and find what I know must be hiding in there somewhere: a cartridge full of simulated dirt that is injected into the dust cup as you vacuum to make you think the Animal is doing a good job. What other explanation could there be?
I can't believe we just spent that much money on a vacuum cleaner. (Or, rather, I can't believe we have to pay off that much on the credit card for a vacuum cleaner.) But this is supposed to be the Rolls Royce of vacuum cleaners, and I think you'll agree that the need was great.Here is our new Dyson Animal DC15 (accompanied by the twins).
I'd heard many stories about the amazing Dyson vacuums, how they pull incredible and disgusting amounts of dirt out of theoretically clean carpets. I was desperate to get my hands on one after learning of Pepper's infestation. (Honestly, I've been wanting one for a long time. This was a perfect excuse to throw economy to the wind and just buy one.)
We began with the living room rug, which had already been vacuumed twice in the previous 24 hours (once with our Hoover bagless vac and once with the Roomba). So it should have been clean, right?
Here's the Animal, triumphant after its maiden run.
You probably can't get a good look at just how disgustingly full that dust cup is. So trust me when I tell you it's totally full, probably more full that it's supposed to get before you empty it out. So gross.
We went from there to the dining room and master bedroom, neither of which had been vacuumed since [time period removed to protect the innocent]. It's just too revolting to show before-and-after pics of the Animal's exploits in those rooms, so I'm not going to. Just trust me when I tell you that it was astonishing. And in each room, neither of which is large, both of which have area rugs rather than wall-to-wall carpeting, I had to empty the dust cup three times before finishing. Seriously, it makes my skin crawl. (Or maybe that's just the fleas.)One small complaint: The Animal's wand tool is rather hard to use. After vacuuming the couch, my arms were aching from trying to control the wand. But it did a great job cleaning the couch, so how much can I really complain?
Overall, I'm quite pleased with the Animal. Is it worth the ridiculous sum of money you have to lay out to get one? It's hard to say. I guess it depends on what incredibly clean carpet is worth to you. Those of you who reside in the Chicagoland area are welcome to borrow mine and give it a spin. I think it'll win you over.
And here, in total disgrace, is the poor, sad Roomba.
If only iRobot and Dyson could get together and make the ultimate vacuum-cleaner robot! I'd pay for that.
Pepper has fleas. There, I said it. And, oh my god, I cannot tell you how much that fact freaks me out. The poor girl has been licking her paws and scratching her belly for weeks, but we thought it was just anxiety (see below), or maybe allergies. That means fleas have been living here, in our home, with our children, for weeks. I don't think I'm going to be able to sleep for days; I'll be up round the clock scrubbing every surface and doing load after load of laundry, washing everything a flea might have thought about touching. I have a feeling we'll be going shopping for a Dyson Animal this evening. (I've been dying for an excuse to buy one. The Roomba is nice and all, for a robot, but it just isn't very effective on dog hair.) I will bet large sums of money that she got the fleas from those [expletive deleted] pigeons. Yet another reason to hate the neighbors. We found out about the fleas because Pepper had an appointment with the vet today to discuss the anxiety problems she's been having ever since we lost Puck. I thought I was going to be blogging about that today: how Pepper's separation anxiety isn't getting any better, how she's now on anti-anxiety medications, and how (let's be honest) none of us are dealing with Puck's loss very well, even with a few months to get used to the idea. But we're going to have to put those thoughts on the back burner for a while as we deal with the infestation. I think it might be easier if we just move out and burn the whole condo down. That's reasonable, isn't it?
I am now my condo association's secretary. I have no idea what that entails, so I think the association is in a heap of trouble. Or I am. One or the other. My hope is that the secretary doesn't do anything other than take notes and look pretty, and I know I can do one of those.
My lunch:
Peanut butter and bacon on whole-wheat toast. The sandwich can reach no greater heights.
It's only September, and I'm dying to turn on the heater. How will I ever survive winter??
Here's why I hate pigeons:
Because I cannot walk out my back door

or down my back stairs
without stepping in pigeon poo.
(Mind you, we just had our back deck and stairs powerwashed a few months ago to clear away even larger piles of pigeon droppings. Those pigeons don't waste any time.)
The problem is our next-door neighbors. They love animals. Their house (let's call it "ramshackle" -- I think that's the kindest way to put it) is home to at least four dogs, an unknown number of cats, and assorted rodent life that might or might not be invited by the owners. And every day (often twice a day), they go out into the yard and scatter loaves of Wonder bread for the pigeons -- the poor, helpless pigeons who can't possibly fend for themselves. They take in sickly, injured, and deformed pigeons and nurse them back to health -- mostly by scattering bread for them. And then the huge flock of pigeons that feasts on bread in their yard takes shelter from the elements on our back stairwell. When winter sets in, it's just going to get worse.
I can understand loving animals. I, too, love animals. I was a vegetarian for several years (and wish I still could be) because of my love for animals. I'm much more likely to cry at a movie that features animals in danger or distress than humans in the same situations. I cannot watch those animal cop shows on The Animal Planet because they're far too distressing. I want every animal to be happy and loved and cared for.
But even I have some limits.
For example, pigeons. I think those rats with wings, those spreaders of disease and vermin and guano, can take care of themselves just fine. And if they can't, that's what we call Survival of the Fittest. Not only is an unnaturally high pigeon population bad for the ecology of our little neighborhood -- it's bad for the people! Pigeons are not clean! They spread more than sixty known illness-causing bacteria in their droppings!
As upset and horrified and grossed out as we are about this situation, we just don't know what to do about it. We've tried everything we can think of. We've confronted the neighbors on several occasions, to no avail. We've called the city many times -- they used to help us out and threaten the neighbors with expensive fines for feeding pigeons, but now the Bureau of Rodent Control doesn't even return our calls anymore, and those threats didn't do a bit of good.
What can we do?? Can anyone suggest pigeon-control methods? Or ways to deal with those crazy neighbors? I'm at my wits' end.
Am I a bad mother for letting the girls hang out in their cribs for extended periods of time when they're clearly no longer napping (as if they ever were napping) just so I can surf the web or play World of Warcraft in peace? I mean, they're not sad in there. They're not crying. They're playing with their crib toys and chattering at each other across the room. They like it in there! I'll get them out the minute they start crying!Is that so bad?
I don't pretend to be the best editor around. I think I do well enough, although I'm sometimes a bit sloppy (please refrain from combing through this blog and bringing the typos and other errors to my attention).There's a type of editor I've encountered many times over the course of my editing career -- I think of them as the persnickety editors, the editors who will defend a style guide to the death and make complicated or cumbersome changes to text not because it helps convey meaning but because the style guide tells them to. These editors learned a handful of die-hard editing rules somewhere along the way, and they cling to these rules with a foolish consistency that serves no purpose other than to gratify their own sensibilities. They eschew the editorial "we" in all cases because they were once told it was wrong. They rebel against passive voice every time they encounter it because they were trained early on to do so. Their infinitives are never split.I, too, spent my formative editing years in just such an environment, with the most persnickety of persnickety editors as my mentors. I learned that every "on the other hand" must be preceded by an "on the one hand" and that if you leave a phrase such as "small business owner" without a hyphen, your poor, stupid readers might* be confused enough to think you're talking about very small people who own businesses.(*I must confess that I very nearly typed "may" instead of "might" in that sentence but changed it because of my own ingrained set of persnickety rules, which includes this: "might" is for probability, while "may" is for permission.)
I've been out in the editing world long enough that I finally feel justified in having some opinions of my own, and here's what I've come to believe (bear in mind that my editing experience is restricted to non-fiction, primarily technical in nature): The persnickety editors are, in my opinion, far too caught up in whether each phrase is "correct" according to their style guide or their internal set of rules, and they are incapable of looking at the big picture. Does the text make sense? Does it communicate its point in a manner that the target audience will be able to understand? Do I, the editor, understand it?An editor's first and primary job is to ensure that the text they're editing conveys meaning as simply and clearly as possible. It is best to leave the author's voice intact as much as possible, which means making the fewest possible changes. If something is downright wrong, then by all means fix it. We will not allow a misused its/it's or their/there/they're or to/too/two or every day/everyday, and so on and so forth. But do most readers really care whether there's an "on the one hand" as long as what they're reading makes sense? Do we really need to get caught up in the minutiae of language that only other editors care about? And, if we really must get caught up in the minutiae, can it not be secondary to conveying meaning? (Can I not stop asking rhetorical questions?)Here's what I'm opposed to: editors who do not understand what they're editing, but who only go through the motions, making sure each sentence has the necessary parts and appropriate punctuation, regardless of what all those words are saying. Pay attention! Educate yourselves! Edit meaningfully! And don't worry so much about whether to use may or might, since or because, each other or one another. Just make sure the words make sense.
I feel compelled to begin this by saying that I love my life. I have very nearly everything a girl could hope for. I love my wonderful husband and my amazing kids. Every one of you should wish you had my life. (I truly believe that, but I'll try not to rub it in your face.)That said, having twins and becoming a stay-at-home mom (surely there's a better term for that) has changed my life in more ways than I could have imagined. The vast majority of those changes are for the good, and I wouldn't trade any of it for the world. However, there are a few things I miss, things about my old life that I wistfully daydream about while wiping food off toddlers' faces, jamming sharp blocks into my instep, and protecting poor Pepper's eyes from being gouged out by curious girls. Those things are, in no particular order:Reading: I used to be an avid reader. I'd read any book that came my way -- fiction or non, science and cyberpunk and Jane Austen and Lemony Snicket. I used to log at least one book every month in my book log. Now I read The Very Hungry Caterpillar and Goodnight Moon.Knitting: Many of you know that I was once a devoted and skilled knitter. I'd spend hours at a time working away on sweaters or blankets or scarves the size of blankets. I have a yarn stash that takes up much precious space in this not-so-large condo. Will I ever get to use it? I fear not.Writing: I once dreamed of writing The Great American Novel. (I had no idea what it was going to be about. I just wanted to write it. Actually, I wanted to have written it, fast-forwarding straight to the praise, adulation, and millions of dollars.) Now, all of my writing ends up right here on the blog. And you know and I know that more often than not, I just post a large picture with a short comment. Pathetic.Sleeping: I used to joke that I suffered from somnia -- the opposite of insomnia. I love to sleep. I'd sleep for 10, 12, 14 hours a day if I could. And let me tell you just how much sleep a mother of 15-month-old twins gets (especially now that they're giving up their morning nap): not much.Spontaneity: When you have twins, they tell you to enforce a strict schedule. Everyone gets up, eats, naps, and goes to bed at the same time. Otherwise, you have complete chaos. I've taken that advice to heart, and for the first time it my life, I stick with military precision to a rigid schedule that varies very little from day to day. And after more than a year of this, I am just about to lose my mind.Size 6: Goodbye, pre-maternity pants. I'd like to think we'll meet up again someday, but that doesn't seem likely.That extra bedroom: Once upon a time, all of our miscellaneous clutter could be piled up in our spare bedroom (the "office," we called it -- "junk room" would have been more accurate). And when it got too overwhelmingly messy in there, all I had to do was close the door and pretend it wasn't there. These days, that room is occupied by two cribs, a rocking chair, a changing table, etc. And all that clutter? Everywhere.I'm not complaining. I love my life. But is it so wrong to have just a tiny bit of nostalgia for things that used to be?
My husband is the coolest husband on the block.Here's what he just gave me for my birthday:
The Alton Brown fans among my dear readers (I think it's just you and me, Kerri) will recognize this as AB's signature saltcellar (or sodium chloride containment unit).But wait! It isn't just your plain old, average, run-of-the-mill saltcellar. Oh no, my friends. Observe:
Autographed by the man himself!! I'm not sure I'll even be able to bring myself to use it for fear of sullying that signature caricature. And in the box, under the saltcellar, I found this:
Be still, my heart. Alton Brown wished me a wonderful birthday. Me. Alton Brown. Wonderful. I don't think there's any point in having birthdays henceforth, because they're not going to get any better than this.
Sometimes I'm not sure whether I have a bigger crush on Airan or Alton. (It's Airan, trust me.) I'm not entirely sure how Airan managed this (he claims he was in Atlanta on "business" last week...), but I'm not asking too many questions. I'm just too excited! Quick, send me recipes that use kosher salt!
Does Drew Barrymore not look totally wasted in that picture? It figures that, in order for me to look like Drew, she'd have to look like complete crap first.(Confession: I shamelessly stole this idea from Sonya -- hope you don't mind, Sonya!)
Airan took this lovely shot of the Chicago skyline from the beach near our condo a few nights ago. I like it so much I thought I'd share it with you. (Yes, you can see that there's a bit of a brown cloud over the downtown area. But it's quite pretty otherwise, isn't it?)
I found this Middle East geography quiz to be an interesting and enlightening challenge. I got a string of eight or so countries with not much trouble, but then I was stumped. (I'm embarrassed to admit that I didn't get Iraq on my first try.) How about you?
(Thanks to Julie for sharing this quiz with me.)